Ex-Soldier Says Glorietta Bomb Too Clean for Terrorists
Former Philippine military man Ram Catadman left the following comments over at Manolo Quezon’s blog regarding the Glorietta bombing: If it was a serious terrorist bombing (Islamist/NPA, etc.), the body count could have been more, the target should be a crowded area, and the deaths or injuries should have been more than blast-related or “shock […]Click here to continue reading "Ex-Soldier Says Glorietta Bomb Too Clean for Terrorists"...Ex-Soldier Says Glorietta Bomb Too Clean for Terrorists
|
Like This Post: Share This Post:  Tweet This Post Share on Facebook Stumble This Post Post to Reddit
|
Good call, Mike. I too thought the same even before this ex-soldier made his statement. I hope you don’t mind if I quote you on my blog. By the way, you sort of look familiar. Did we go to the same college?
Personally, I find this comment a complete bullcrap. Yes, RDX may be one of C-4’s signature but C4 isn’t the only bomb that has RDX. And about shrapnels, why place then when you’re detonating a bomb inside a warehouse and no one would be hit? *zips water with iodized salt*
I admit that I don’t like Sen. Lacson, but I admired him when he was interviewed and asked if the gov’t has anything to do with this explosion. He hates the gov’t but instead of finger pointing, he said that we should all wait for the result of the investigation. Very professional and educated unlike that other detained blabbering Trillanes.
Oh well, can’t blame people who’re can’t forget the Martial Law era. But being paranoid won’t help.
Dennison: Quote away. I don’t think I’ve had the pleasure of studying with you, though. Where did you go to school?
Jepoy: You’re right, paranoia doesn’t help. Asking questions does, though.
I’m surprised how this is handled and being probed correctly. Though of course with paranoia of the public, there will be ‘two’ stories. One with the potential actual data that will possibly be available in the know, and the other is the public story that is used to skew the potential truth. But yah, definitely not a terrorist attack. Sounds more like an elaborate and expensive prank than an attack at the hearts of the people.
Mike: ADMU. I just saw your Linkedin profile and you may be right. We do have common connections though. 🙂 Cheers.
jeopy: Unlike Lacson, Trillanes was formerly and insider and he has nothing to loose.