Comments on: Ex-Soldier Says Glorietta Bomb Too Clean for Terrorists

By: efren antiporda

efren antiporda — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:42:39 +0000

as long as the pnp is involved in the investigation truth will always be subservient to the powers that be. im tired of the reptilian brain taking charge of this investigation. Its amazing how they utter lies in national media without bliking an eye. They are now telling its the septic tank methane gas and the diesel fumes that caused this explosion and the by product is this “RDX” stuff. Can somebody tell me how human shit can deliver such bloody explosion. How and what is the trigger mechanism. Im becoming afraid to drive my diesel car and fart inside my car for fear of turning my car into a truck bomb he he he

By: lusanto_bluzone2087

lusanto_bluzone2087 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:32:51 +0000

I’v done some research about RDX on Wiki, and I found out that RDX was an acronym for Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine, an explosive nitroamine. Many acronyms for this C4 component were Cyclonite, T4, H-6 and Hexogen. Nomenclature variants include Cyclotrimethylene-trinitramine and Cyclotrimethylene Trinitramine.
Here’s the link about this infamous component: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDX

By: zephir

zephir — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:12:23 +0000

if i want to spread terror ,i would have chosen sm mega or mall of asia,or lrt and mrt.maybe the rumors are true ,that they just did this to scare the people so that the government will have the reason to declare state of emergency or even martial law,(hope not)

By: Dennison Uy - Graphic Designer

Dennison Uy - Graphic Designer — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:09:45 +0000

Mike: ADMU. I just saw your Linkedin profile and you may be right. We do have common connections though. Cheers.

jeopy: Unlike Lacson, Trillanes was formerly and insider and he has nothing to loose.

By: CoCaFire

CoCaFire — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 04:59:13 +0000

I’m surprised how this is handled and being probed correctly. Though of course with paranoia of the public, there will be ‘two’ stories. One with the potential actual data that will possibly be available in the know, and the other is the public story that is used to skew the potential truth. But yah, definitely not a terrorist attack. Sounds more like an elaborate and expensive prank than an attack at the hearts of the people.

By: Mike Abundo

Mike Abundo — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:06:49 +0000

Dennison: Quote away. I don’t think I’ve had the pleasure of studying with you, though. Where did you go to school?

Jepoy: You’re right, paranoia doesn’t help. Asking questions does, though.

By: jepoy

jepoy — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:44:33 +0000

Personally, I find this comment a complete bullcrap. Yes, RDX may be one of C-4′s signature but C4 isn’t the only bomb that has RDX. And about shrapnels, why place then when you’re detonating a bomb inside a warehouse and no one would be hit? *zips water with iodized salt*

I admit that I don’t like Sen. Lacson, but I admired him when he was interviewed and asked if the gov’t has anything to do with this explosion. He hates the gov’t but instead of finger pointing, he said that we should all wait for the result of the investigation. Very professional and educated unlike that other detained blabbering Trillanes.

Oh well, can’t blame people who’re can’t forget the Martial Law era. But being paranoid won’t help.

By: Dennison Uy - Graphic Designer

Dennison Uy - Graphic Designer — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:36:12 +0000

Good call, Mike. I too thought the same even before this ex-soldier made his statement. I hope you don't mind if I quote you on my blog. By the way, you sort of look familiar. Did we go to the same college?